@article {319,
	title = {Pluriannual analysis of the reserve effect on ichthyofauna in the Scandola natural reserve (Corsica, Northwestern Mediterranean)},
	journal = {Oceanologica Acta},
	year = {1994},
	abstract = {<p>From July 1988 to September 1992, Scuba divers used a non destructive sampling method to study the fish communities if rocks ans Posidonia oceanica seagrass beds, in Scandola Marine reserve. Sites wereestablished in the integral reserve (protection of the marine environment), in the non-ontegral reserve (partial protection) and outise the reserve (no protection). Average density and biomass of the sampled population in P. oceanica seagrass beds showed no significant difference between the sites in the integral reserve and the others. Only the integrally-protected shallow nd deep water zones showed considerably reduced seasonal variations. For rocky sustrata, the integral reserve site demonstrated higher density and biomass than the other sites. The impact of seasonal variations on the sampled population was not reduced in this biotope, as in the seagrass beds. Whatever the biotope, the demographic structures of the fish population sampled in the integral reserve ans in the other sites were different: the number of large fishes (matured adults) was always the highest. Species diversity was slightly greater in the seagrass bed sites of the integral reserve, but site variations were not significant. This was also true for rocky substrata; in contrast, lesser seasonal differences were recorded in the integral reserve than outside. Three conclusions can be drawn from these pluriannual observations : 1) The reserve effect is real, not just theorical, and affects the fish population in both rocks and seagrass beds. 2) The two sites studied, the Posidonia oceanica seagrass beds and rocky sustrata, react very differently to protection which reduces anthropogenic disturbances. These differences may be attributed to the degree of sensitivity of the dominant families (Labridae in the seagrass, Sparidae in rocky susbtrata) to all disturbances. 3) The reserve effect comprises both a refuge ans a buffer effect. The refuge effect is the most traditionnally highlightened and is characterized by more large fishes adn a greater variety of species and noble fishes (Dicentrarchus labrax, sparus aurata, Epinephelus marginatus, Sciaena umbra). The buffer effect, never shomn in previous studies, is characterized by the fact that the impact of seasonal variations on parameters such as density, biomass, and diversity is consederably lessened.</p>},
	keywords = {biotope, buffer zone, comparison, Corsica, deep water, density, Dicentrarchus labrax, diversity, dusky, environment, Epinephelus marginatus, fish, France, impact, integral reserve, labridae, Ligurian Sea, marine protected area, marine reserve, Mediterranean sea, natural reserve, no-take area, population, Posidonia oceanica, protection, protection effectiveness, reserve effect, rocky shore, Scandola, Sciaena umbra, seagrass, sparidae, Sparus aurata, western Mediterranean},
	author = {P. Francour}
}
